Profit From Uranium and Nuclear Power
As you know, I spent a considerable amount of time working in the alternative energy industry as an investment banker.
I had the opportunity to look at and analyze projects and look at new technologies that were so early stage that most experts had never heard of them.
I also had the opportunity to learn and discuss many different opinions from industry experts, academics, and some of the leading CEOs in the field.
All of this exposure not only taught me a great deal about the markets, the industry and new technology, but it also shaped my views on the energy industry as a whole.
For better or worse I am biased towards alternative energy.
I have seen the pollution and damage first hand that a fossil fuel based infrastructure can cause.
The good thing is that I truly believe that eventually, in my lifetime, we will see a new energy infrastructure based on hydrogen, which will be much more environmentally friendly and most importantly economic.
In my years in banking I learned that many little things the experts take for granted about the industry, most of the investing public has no knowledge about.
One of the most interesting data points I learned was that where we stand today, hydrogen can be used in a similar form to gasoline.
The energy from its combustion can be used to power an automobile, with some slight modification.
Granted, the modification needed is expensive now, but no doubt it will come down in price in the future.
Clearly this is a natural stepping stone to a hydrogen driven economy.
Fuel cells, those great miracles of energy production, are hugely inefficient, expensive, and extremely fragile.
It will be many years before they become widespread enough to materially impact the energy economy, but it is starting to happen.
Now I know many of the environmentalists are standing up and cheering .
.
.
sit down.
While I love the environment, I think that a hydrogen economy makes sense - Economic Sense.
This is economic because with the price of Oil where it is - above $80, and the incidental costs (but not insignificant - think the cost of the War in Iraq) of securing our oil supply will force new technologies into the market.
So what's the problem? Well, how do we make all of the hydrogen we will eventually need? Again, another thing most people don't realize, hydrogen is currently made in mass quantities by using natural gas and oil.
Amazing isn't it? The one thing we want to rely upon less, oil and gas, is precisely the substance we need to convert to hydrogen to get away from oil and gas.
So much for eliminating the influence of the Middle East! There is a solution which is being adopted by many emerging growth countries who are themselves afraid of Middle East oil dependency.
They are turning to nuclear energy, which is a relatively clean form of energy production, and one that several people are considering the next "green" energy supply.
Now I know nuclear has become a four letter word here in the US, especially after the Three-Mile Island incident, and Chernobyl.
However, I believe that the future of alternative energy, and global energy independence lies in the use of uranium for power.
Globally, the demands on the power infrastructure are expected to double over the next few decades.
As we stand today, 31 new reactors are under construction, and many more are being considered.
Currently, nuclear energy supplies some 15% of the world's electric demands .
.
.
and while other alternative sources like solar and wind are growing, nothing can deliver the same bang for the buck.
New emerging world economies are being set up to run on nuclear, and it is being embraced by not only the governments but the people of these countries.
It is a steady supply of cheap inexhaustible energy that will drive their economies over the next several decades.
Only four companies in the world supply new nuclear facilities, and only a handful of countries have the uranium deposits needed to run these reactors.
The price of Uranium recently peaked on the world market, and is still trading near record highs.
The nuclear revolution is coming .
.
.
will you profit from it?
I had the opportunity to look at and analyze projects and look at new technologies that were so early stage that most experts had never heard of them.
I also had the opportunity to learn and discuss many different opinions from industry experts, academics, and some of the leading CEOs in the field.
All of this exposure not only taught me a great deal about the markets, the industry and new technology, but it also shaped my views on the energy industry as a whole.
For better or worse I am biased towards alternative energy.
I have seen the pollution and damage first hand that a fossil fuel based infrastructure can cause.
The good thing is that I truly believe that eventually, in my lifetime, we will see a new energy infrastructure based on hydrogen, which will be much more environmentally friendly and most importantly economic.
In my years in banking I learned that many little things the experts take for granted about the industry, most of the investing public has no knowledge about.
One of the most interesting data points I learned was that where we stand today, hydrogen can be used in a similar form to gasoline.
The energy from its combustion can be used to power an automobile, with some slight modification.
Granted, the modification needed is expensive now, but no doubt it will come down in price in the future.
Clearly this is a natural stepping stone to a hydrogen driven economy.
Fuel cells, those great miracles of energy production, are hugely inefficient, expensive, and extremely fragile.
It will be many years before they become widespread enough to materially impact the energy economy, but it is starting to happen.
Now I know many of the environmentalists are standing up and cheering .
.
.
sit down.
While I love the environment, I think that a hydrogen economy makes sense - Economic Sense.
This is economic because with the price of Oil where it is - above $80, and the incidental costs (but not insignificant - think the cost of the War in Iraq) of securing our oil supply will force new technologies into the market.
So what's the problem? Well, how do we make all of the hydrogen we will eventually need? Again, another thing most people don't realize, hydrogen is currently made in mass quantities by using natural gas and oil.
Amazing isn't it? The one thing we want to rely upon less, oil and gas, is precisely the substance we need to convert to hydrogen to get away from oil and gas.
So much for eliminating the influence of the Middle East! There is a solution which is being adopted by many emerging growth countries who are themselves afraid of Middle East oil dependency.
They are turning to nuclear energy, which is a relatively clean form of energy production, and one that several people are considering the next "green" energy supply.
Now I know nuclear has become a four letter word here in the US, especially after the Three-Mile Island incident, and Chernobyl.
However, I believe that the future of alternative energy, and global energy independence lies in the use of uranium for power.
Globally, the demands on the power infrastructure are expected to double over the next few decades.
As we stand today, 31 new reactors are under construction, and many more are being considered.
Currently, nuclear energy supplies some 15% of the world's electric demands .
.
.
and while other alternative sources like solar and wind are growing, nothing can deliver the same bang for the buck.
New emerging world economies are being set up to run on nuclear, and it is being embraced by not only the governments but the people of these countries.
It is a steady supply of cheap inexhaustible energy that will drive their economies over the next several decades.
Only four companies in the world supply new nuclear facilities, and only a handful of countries have the uranium deposits needed to run these reactors.
The price of Uranium recently peaked on the world market, and is still trading near record highs.
The nuclear revolution is coming .
.
.
will you profit from it?
Source...